Friday, February 25, 2005

Vox Blogoli 2.2 , A Perspective

This is regarding Hugh Hewitts solicitation of legitimate bloggers for an opinion on whether senate republicans should go Grant or McClellan on the Dems. and their obstructionism of judicial nominees, but I'm going to respond anyway.
Being a person who finds it odd,to say the least, that we live in a world where the idea of ending the afforementioned and unprecedented obstructionism by suggesting that there be actual up or down votes on nominees is called "The Nuclear Option", while at the same time it's just good old American free speech for a college professor to advocate the mass murder of innocent civilians, you can probably guess where this is going.
Not being nuanced here at the BoA or overly concerned with senate procedure/decorum, I'd like to see something more "Jenjis Khan-ish" to paraphrase the Senator from the great state of Mass. convusion, but seeing as how the Civil War was the bloodiest military engagement in history up 'til it's time, Grant will do.
All decisions to act must be made with the goal of achieving actual success-that being the casting of votes on brilliant men and women like Estrada and Janice Rodgers Brown- and not just posturing in line with decorum, procedure and tradition. Senator Frist is a wonderful person with a great life story, but his finger waving disappointments of the past just won't suffice and never did. Spectre is a brilliant mind who could disembowel liberties opponents if they were his opponents-he was great in the Clarence Thomas hearings as I recall- but they are his "colleagues" and their slurring of fine nominees will continue on without appropriate response from him. Also, Senator Hatch surrendered his post dutifully so he has less bite now although I do like the idea of Orrin as our front man/pit-bull along the lines of a much more legitemate (sane?) version of Edward K. -who is the number one reason for any cracks in my faith that there is a just God.
That's it for the woulda's, coulda's and what ifs, here's what should happen...if only.
President George Bush uses the bullypulpit and his political capital-which is not finite and could actually be built upon if done right- by bringing the truth and importance of this issue, loud and proud, to the American people when the obstructionists do their thing. No more sitting back and saying "Look at 'em go, everyone'll see what they're all about now". No ! Exploit, with dignity, what we all know the left would exploit were the tables turned."Harry Reid doesn't want Hispanics to succeed in America", "Pat Leahy is oppressing women and blacks". They'll still get re-elected, but at least the people who don't have a chance to vote for them will get a chance to actually see what they are all about. The difference with laughing and pointing being, that their ugliness is vigorously highlighted.
What would be the consequence ? Can the Dems prove that these nominees are actually Bible clutching prudes who want to return us to "jim crowe", sweatshops and start a state run religion ? Make them prove it or shut the hell up.
No matter how docile the right is, we're still tarred as liars, lynch mobs, nazis, starvers of children, advocates for seniors on dog food diets and of course we're always too mean to mass murderers of children/innocents and wanna be assassins of our President. They're going to say these things anyway. They always say these things anyway.Take the fight to them! Being kowed into mentalities like "compassionate conservatism"-as opposed to "regular conservatism" which we all know is where the truly mean still reside- has been a detrement to our already faltering morality and to the very security of our great nation.
Americans are starving for a decisive man of action to lead the way. Enemies are enemies, they must be defeated whether it's Sadaam or the radical left in the form of all to many- and unnecessarily- powerful democrats who happen to be fellow citizens by a mistake of birth. You took down Iraqs killer regime, do you think Barbara Boxer is tougher than them ?
Compromises that lead to activists like S.D. O'connor, Souter and Kennedy wreaking havoc on the Constitution can't be allowed to happen anymore if the Republic is to be preserved in some sort of resemblance to what the creators envisioned.Look at all of the "legislating from the bench" that's gone on because the principle of insisting that strict constitutionalists be given a fair chance has been subordinated to politics and the whimsy of peoples feelings."If you can't see the Constitution as a 'living breathing document', then how sensitive can you be to the plight of the downtrodden when called upon to do what's right for the sake of the whole?"
Activist judges have changed the direction of this country forever while potential giants like Scalia and worse yet, Bork, have been defanged and rendered all but or totally inefective but for the honor of the fight.
So I say let 'em have it with both barrels blazin' and when you run out, reload and keep on firing. Screw "nuclear", go Armageddon on their asses.
For the benefit of my regular reader, Hugh Hewitt is a monster in the world of political opinion- with millions of listeners- who also writes books that sell into the multiples of many thousands, something we wouldn't know about here.There, just referred to myself in the 3rd person and plurally in the same sentence. Bet ol' Hugh's never pulled that one off before.


Saturday, February 12, 2005

Scenario Proof

Let us say that YOU don't like "Joe Blow". He represents everything that you are against. It only makes sense that, this guy Joe, would probably do heinous things given the opportunity considering your absolute hatred for and mistrust of him. Hey, he's that rotten bastard Joe Blow and last week it was reported on, "OurBS is Killing Jews & U.S. Troops Nightly", that Joe likes to do bad things and they even had an 8 second documentary-painstakingly removed from HOURS of footage- that "proved" their assertion. Now let's say that you then start speaking the "truth" (as your hate dictates it) in your neighborhood and anywhere you can be heard. No, there's no facts to support your claims-which after all, are coming from an irrational hate of Joe- so you naturally don't make an "official" claim/report as to your beliefs, but there is NO doubt as to the attitude from which you speak in your daily job of "reporting" the news yourself. Plus, you go around in "informal" venues stating your case sans proof. Word then gets around about your "belief system" and people sympathetic to Joe Blow become outraged by the effect you're causing him. His house is burned to the ground. His wife is raped. His kids are murdered. According to your "belief system", Joe's getting what he deserves. But you have no facts to support your hypothosis. Are you guilty of a crime ?

"YOU" are, "THIS IS CNN"/eason jordan and "Joe Blow" is obviously the American fighting man and ALL those who support him. I submit that you are a criminal and should stand before a court of law for the CRIME of Slander With Intent to Harm. No one could argue about your total disregard as to the harm you bring to the U.S. Fighting Man and why else would you say these lies unless you wanted to cause the complete and total failure-that means death in greater numbers to the TARGET of your MALICIOUS slander and all of the collateral damage that goes with it- of his mission .

With this in mind I would like it be known that someone has told me, "eason jordan associates with known criminal figures and is believed to be involved in child porn and probably produces films of this nature in his own basement and when he's done he murders his victims and buries them in a backlot at aol/timewarner headquarters." Or so I'm told.

If you read that last paragraph and found yourself outraged, please tell me the difference-legitimacy wise-between it and the swill that this hater and disseminator of putrid anti-American HATE SPEECH is spewing forth with his screed at Davos and the attitude with which he infects the network he's in charge of. (If we're both wrong that's fine, I'll surrender some of my "assets" for slander and Mr. jordan can abdicate his freedom-or at least renounce his citizenship and ALL of the benefits he derives from it via the blood of U.S. fighting men now and throughout history- for the crime of treason through subversion.)

Check back later for a duplicitous, mealymouthed, worm-spined,, denial of parts of the above as I see fit.

And...CUT !...burn the tape. I probably wasn't even ever really here folks. Go on 'boutch yer bid'ness.


" Eason Jordan for cell block T "

To aquire the gist of the following, scan the bottom paragragh first.
You have worked on the INSIDE.To say that the MAINSTREAM media doesn't have it in for our military is absurd.You know better.WE know better! The public has eyes and ears, and they are attached to our brains.The crime is not in the cover-up.The CRIMINALITY is in SLANDERING the virtuous being that is the American fighting man.So when "Mr. jordan" slithers off into the slimeset without so much as a slap on the wrist-legally speaking- for his treason speak,know that millions will be outraged at his NOT getting his comeuppance.That is if they ever get all of the facts.Israel knows and thanks to Michelle Malkin, Hugh Hewitt and so many others,hopefully everyone will.The fact that the MSM refuses to report this straight (damn you howie) is clear proof of their collusion against our brave servicemen & women who deserve better,considering we'd ALL be speaking German or wearing a burkha without their,not known by any of us civilians,COURAGEOUS BLOODSHED.

This post is in response to a post by Rebecca MacKinnon
regarding "Eason Gate.". These statements are believed here sincerely, this person must NOT escape unscathed. I'd like to say thanks to everyone-individually- for the illumination, but it's easier to just say, "Go to Michelle Malkin", she has all of the links-including, Easongate tracker - that are pertinent(minus mine).Hey, I'm posting a "letter to the editor" to another site, just not that prolific or equipped with little monkeys like GENERALISSIMO DUANE to facilitate this stuff smooth and easy.


Tuesday, February 01, 2005

"Churchill" as Chamberlain in America

This is about the college professor by the name of Churchill who takes "Neville Chamberlainism" to a new level. This person, through his statements -and subsequent responses to critisisms of those statements- has basically solicited the continuing mass slaughter of THOUSANDS of what he calls "Little eichmanns"-ie; You & Me. Even Neville never went THAT far. This guy makes up for his lack of power with a very powerful encouragement to those that would-and already have- commited mass murder against us.

Is this the new pacifism? This person "hates" war but advocates the mass murder of innocents, while somehow analogizing them to an ACTUAL facilitator of mass murder. Hey you in the Dockers with the Starbucks in your hand, you must DIE so as to realize the justice of those who would reinstate sadaam h. and appoint ubl as the "grand dragon" of the new ruling class that would be made up of the current xenophobes trying to destroy Freedom with acts of unspeakable horror against women and small children with the thrust and verve of their Titanic heroe, adolph hitler.

"Listen to mike moore and me, they must KEEP on killing the bastards that gave them no other choice but to start the killing in mass, one bloody Tuesday New York morning" this "sage" and filler of young sculls full of mush seems to say proudly and without fear of the swift hand of justice once meted out in in time of war.

What are we doing folks ? If we can't go beyond whining about this sort of treason and take action against those who aide and abet our blood enemies for the sake of so-called "free speech" (I thought that it was unlawful to holler "kill Americans" in a crowded representative republic) then where is the limit ? If a "reporter" is witness to a beheading of one of US "infidels" while relaying the "concerns" of the offended killer, are we to say, "NO, this is merely an excercise of the 1st amendment, we must be informed of both sides for full consideration of the facts. They just have a 'different point of veiw'. Who are we to say that this is right or that is wrong ? Besides, there's still 'Iran contra' sins of the past to consider and what about the two percent of Iraq's arsenal that 'we' contributed to ?"

No folks, action must be taken. Yes, it was a different time when the "Proclamation Suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus" was undertaken, but that was "only" for the sake of the Union. What is now at hand is the future of the lives of freedom loving people EVERYWHERE. The streets of progress could go dead for a thousand years if these animals have there way and word has it that they have access to the mechanisms that could make that nightmare come true. An example must be made and it must be made with conviction and righteousness. A senator would be preferable, but a racist, self hating ANTI-AMERICAN will suffice. Put the son-of-a-bitch in leg irons and show the American people... SHOW THE WORLD, that you don't mess with the U.S., you don't mess with New York and yes, YOU DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS and get away with it !!!

To see goodness, go here.

Amen and pass the ammo. 2spot, over & out.


You have the right to remain silent,NOW SHUT UP !!!

Tell me You can read this and not think of Senators "bellyflop" kennedy, ALgore, "braburner" boxer, "leaky" leahy and the bunch.

Proclamation Suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus
Whereas, it has become necessary to call into service not only volunteers but also portions of the militia of the States by draft in order to suppress the insurrection existing in the United States, and disloyal persons are not adequately restrained by the ordinary processes of law from hindering this measure and from giving aid and comfort in various ways to the insurrection;
Now, therefore, be it ordered, first, that during the existing insurrection and as a necessary measure for suppressing the same, all Rebels and Insurgents, their aiders and abettors within the United States, and all persons discouraging volunteer enlistments, resisting militia drafts, or guilty of any disloyal practice, affording aid and comfort to Rebels against the authority of United States, shall be subject to martial law and liable to trial and punishment by Courts Martial or Military Commission:
Second. That the Writ of Habeas Corpus is suspended in respect to all persons arrested, or who are now, or hereafter during the rebellion shall be, imprisoned in any fort, camp, arsenal, military prison, or other place of confinement by any military authority of by the sentence of any Court Martial or Military Commission.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
Done at the City of Washington this twenty fourth day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-two, and of the Independence of the United States the 87th.
By the President:
WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.

I know George Bush, a man of honor, would never do this lest he appear to be whiny-as though A.C.L.U. appologists for the assassins of freedom fighters/innocents are not whining- but, is it dishonorable or whiny to smack down the American cowards who openly encourage our enemy, which results directly in the deaths of MORE of OUR soldiers and countless targeted innocents ?
I can just see the perp walk now...Oh how sweet it'd be.